posted on 2025-12-23, 23:57authored byLiam Berigan, Sarah Clements, Rachel Darling, Alexander Fish, Amber Roth, Greg Balkcom, Bobbi Carpenter, Gary Costanzo, Jeffrey Duguay, Kayleigh Filkins, Clayton Graham, William Harvey, Michael Hook, Douglas Howell, Seth Maddox, Scott McWilliams, Shawn Meyer, Theodore Nichols, J. Bruce Pollard, Christian Roy, David Sausville, Colby Slezak, Josh Stiller, Jacob Straub, Mathieu Tetreault, Dawn Washington, Lisa Williams, Erik Blomberg
<p>Understanding bird migration at low altitudes is critical to evaluating risk of collision with obstacles. Recent advances in satellite tracking technologies allow quantifying use of low altitudes by small migrating birds with a high level of precision, allowing species-level inference into potential collision risk based on flight altitude. The American Woodcock (<em>Scolopax minor</em>) is suspected to be a low altitude migrant due to its frequent collisions with buildings, and subsequent mortality during migration may be contributing to population declines. We investigated migratory flight altitudes using satellite transmitters deployed on woodcock in 2020–2024 and examined how flight altitudes compare to the heights of common airspace obstacles. Each transmitter recorded a nocturnal GPS location with an altitude reading every 1–3 days during fall and spring migrations. We implemented a Bayesian hierarchical mixture model to identify whether locations were recorded on the ground or during flight, isolate measurement error, and describe the distribution of flight altitudes. We found that migrating woodcock fly at mean altitudes of 379 m above ground level, flying higher during spring (mean: 444 m, 95% credible interval: 333–578 m) than fall (338 m, 95% CRI: 267–423 m). Woodcock flight altitudes were frequently lower than could be observed using weather radar (27% of observations), and 57% of observations fell within the altitude range of ≥1 airspace obstacle. Our results suggest that woodcock fly at altitudes lower than reported for most nocturnal migrants, which likely contributes to their vulnerability to obstacle collisions. Woodcock provide an example of how vulnerability to obstacle collisions during nocturnal migratory flights are often species-specific, and mitigation efforts should incorporate measures aimed at reducing collisions during both diurnal stopovers and nocturnal migratory flights to effectively reduce bird collision mortality.</p>
Funding
Alabama Department of Conservation and Natural Resources
American Woodcock Society
Association des Savaginiers du Saguenay-Lac-St-Jean
United States Fish and Wildlife Service
Club des Bécassiers du Québec
Eastern Bird Banding Association
Environment and Climate Change Canada
Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission
Friends of the 500th
Georgia Department of Natural Resources
Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries
Maine Department of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife
Maryland Department of Natural Resources
New Jersey Division of Fish and Wildlife
New York State Department of Environmental Conservation
North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission
Old Hemlock Foundation
Pennsylvania Game Commission
Maine Audubon
Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management
Ruffed Grouse Society
South Carolina Department of Natural Resources
The Nature Conservancy
United States Geological Survey
University of Maine
University of Rhode Island
Vermont Fish and Wildlife Department
Virginia Department of Wildlife Resources
West Virginia Highlands Conservancy
Wildlife Management Institute
Woodcock Conservation Society
USDA-NIFA: McIntire-Stennis project numbers ME0-21422 and ME0-42018