Ag Data Commons
Browse

Joint environmental and social benefits from diversified agriculture

Version 2 2025-11-23, 02:46
Version 1 2025-08-19, 02:30
dataset
posted on 2025-11-23, 02:46 authored by Laura Vang Rasmussen, Ingo Grass, Zia Mehrabi, Olivia Smith, Rachel Bezner Kerr, Jennifer Blesh jblesh@umich.edu, L. A. Garibaldi, Marney Isaac, Christina KennedyChristina Kennedy, Hannah Wittman, Péter Batáry, Damayanti Buchori, Rolando Cerda, Julián Chará, David CrowderDavid Crowder, Kevin Darras, Kathryn DeMaster, Karina Garcia, Manuel Gómez, David Gonthier, Purnama Hidayat, Juliana Hipólito, Mark Hirons, Lesli Hoey, Dana James, Innocensia John, Andrew Jones, Daniel S. Karp, Yodit Kebede, Carmen Kerr, Susanna Klassen, Martyna Kotowska, Holger Kreft, Christian Levers, Diego j. LizcanoDiego j. Lizcano, Ramiro Llanque, Adrian Lu, Sidney Madsen, Rosebelly Nunes Marques, Pedro Buss Martins, America Melo, Hanson Nyantakyi-Frimpong, Elissa OlimpiElissa Olimpi, Jeb Owen, Heiber Pantevez, Matin Qaim, Sarah Redlich, Christoph ScherberChristoph Scherber, Amber Sciligo, Sieglinde Snapp, William Snyder, Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter, Anne Stratton, Joseph Taylor, Teja Tscharntke, Vivian Valencia, Cassandra Vogel, Claire Kremen
<p>Agricultural simplification continues to expand at the expense of more diverse forms of agriculture. This simplification in the form of, for example, intensively-managed monocultures, poses a risk to keeping the world within safe and just Earth system boundaries. Here, we estimate how agricultural diversification simultaneously affects social and environmental outcomes. Drawing from 24 studies in 11 countries across 2,655 farms, we show how five diversification strategies focusing on livestock, crops, soils, non-crop plantings, and water conservation benefit social (human well-being, yields, food security) and environmental (biodiversity, ecosystem services, reduced environmental externalities) outcomes. We find that applying multiple diversification strategies creates more positive outcomes than individual management strategies alone. To realize these benefits, well-designed policies are needed to incentivize the adoption of multiple diversification strategies in unison.</p><p>The raw data file is .xlsx and the compound variables and other constructed variables are in a CSV file.  All data processing and statistical analyses were performed using R software.</p>

Funding

NSF: DBI-1639145

NSF: 1852587

World Bank Group: CMSCR-P104687

European Research Council: 853222 FORESTDIET

European Research Council: 796451 (FFSize)

National Research, Development and Innovation Office: NKFIH KKP 133839

USDA: 2015- 67019- 23147/1005662

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council: 523660-2018

Federal Ministry of Education and Research: 01LC11804A

The Research Council of Norway: 295442

USDA: 12679452- 2019-67012-29720

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft: DFG, CRC 990

University of British Columbia

European Union: 311781

Belmont University

USDA: 2015-51300-24155

European Union: 727284

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft: 390732324

Canada Research Chairs

Natural Environment Research Council: NE/K010379-1

NERC: NE/P001092/1

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council: BB/J014427/1

Natural Environment Research Council: NE/P00394X/1

BiodivERsA

History

Related Materials

Data contact name

Rasmussen, Laura Vang

Data contact email

lr@ign.ku.dk

Publisher

Dryad

Theme

  • Not specified

ISO Topic Category

  • biota

National Agricultural Library Thesaurus terms

livestock; ecosystems; biodiversity; Earth system science; water conservation; social welfare; food security; risk

Pending citation

  • No

Public Access Level

  • Public

Usage metrics

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC