Ag Data Commons
Browse
TEXT
00_file_descriptions.txt (7.79 kB)
TEXT
notes_01_hybseq_processing_v06.sh.txt (43.75 kB)
TEXT
notes_02_hybseq_gene_fam_constr_v04.sh.txt (18.65 kB)
TEXT
notes_03_hybseq_consen_species_trees_v02.sh.txt (8.21 kB)
TEXT
notes_04_hybseq_consen_wgd_trees_v11.sh.txt (16.67 kB)
DATASET
S01_project_species_v03.xlsx (66.49 kB)
DATASET
S02_counts_per_sp_per_genefam_v03.xlsx (777.36 kB)
DATASET
S03_arbor_trimmed2_v06.xlsx (11.71 MB)
DATASET
S04_hybseq_seqs_in_tree_order_v04.xlsx (12.1 MB)
ARCHIVE
S05_legume_targets.tar.gz (112.06 kB)
ARCHIVE
S06_assembled_paralogs_cds.tar.gz (10.48 MB)
ARCHIVE
S07_assembled_paralogs_pep.tar.gz (3.52 MB)
ARCHIVE
S08_profile_hmm.tar.gz (14.75 MB)
ARCHIVE
S09_16_fams_pruned.tar.gz (3.13 MB)
ARCHIVE
S10_hmm_align.tar.gz (3.49 MB)
ARCHIVE
S11_hmm_align_trim2.tar.gz (2.57 MB)
ARCHIVE
S12_trees_all.tar.gz (606.27 kB)
ARCHIVE
S13_concat_align_species_tree_Fig1.tar.gz (552.49 kB)
ARCHIVE
S14_concat_align_wgd.tar.gz (953.49 kB)
1/0
19 files

Data from: Complex Reticulation in Backbone Subfamily Relationships in Leguminosae

dataset
posted on 2024-08-01, 12:34 authored by STEVEN CANNONSTEVEN CANNON, Jacob S. Stai, Anne Bruneau, Warren M. Cardinal-McTeague

Contradictory lines of evidence have made it difficult to resolve the phylogenetic history of the legume diversification era; this is true for the backbone topology, and for the number and timing of whole genome duplications (WGDs). By analyzing the transcriptomic data for 473 gene families in 76 species covering all six accepted legume subfamilies, we assessed the phylogenetic relationships of the legume backbone and uncovered evidence of independent whole genome duplications in each of the six legume subfamilies. Three subfamilies — Cercidoideae, Dialioideae, and Caesalpinioideae — bear evidence of an allopolyploid duplication pattern suggestive of ancient hybridization. In Cercidoideae and Dialioideae, the hybridization appears to be within-subfamily, with the basal genera Cercis and Poeppigia appearing to be unduplicated descendants of one of the parental lineages; in Caesalpinioideae, the hybridization appears to involve a member of the Papilionoid lineage, and some other lineage, potentially extinct. Three independent lines of evidence, consisting of a concatenated superalignment, concordance factor analysis of the set of gene family alignments and topologies, and direct inference of reticulation events via maximum pseudolikelihood implemented by PhyloNet, converged on a single backbone hypothesis and the above hypotheses of reticulate evolution.

Funding

USDA-ARS: 5030-21000-071-000D

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council

Find out more...

SciNet: Enabling Future Science Today

Ministry of Advanced Education and Skills Development

Find out more...

History

Data contact name

Cannon, Steven B

Data contact email

Steven.cannon@usda.gov

Publisher

Ag Data Commons

Intended use

Supplementary data associated with publication. Includes methods and data for reproducibility and for further analysis.

Use limitations

Publication on this data prior to publication by the primary author group is not permitted.

Temporal Extent Start Date

2020-01-01

Temporal Extent End Date

2024-07-01

Theme

  • Not specified

ISO Topic Category

  • biota
  • environment

National Agricultural Library Thesaurus terms

phylogeny; legumes; topology; transcriptomics; genes; allopolyploidy; hybridization; Cercis; Poeppigia; factor analysis; Fabaceae; Caesalpinioideae; Faboideae

OMB Bureau Code

  • 005:18 - Agricultural Research Service

OMB Program Code

  • 005:040 - National Research

ARS National Program Number

  • 301

Pending citation

  • Yes

Public Access Level

  • Public

Preferred dataset citation

Complex Reticulation in Backbone Subfamily Relationships in Leguminosae Jacob Stai, Warren Cardinal-McTeague, Anne Bruneau, Steven Cannon