<p dir="ltr">These data are the result of a four-year (2017-2020) study comparing rangeland forage and cattle responses across three grazing management practices in central North Dakota. In each season, cow-calf pairs grazed on n = 4 pastures for each grazing management practice: <i>Patch burned</i>, in which a 40-ac patch of 160-ac pastures were burned with prescribed fire each spring with no internal fences; <i>Continuous</i>, in which neither prescribed fire nor internal fences were used; and <i>Rotational</i>, in which 40-ac pastures were sub-divided into 4 paddocks each with no prescribed fire. The data were primarily managed by Megan Wanchuk in support of her Master's thesis: </p><p dir="ltr">Wanchuk, MR. 2022. <i>Patch-Burning Improves Forage Nutritive Value and Livestock Performance over Rotational and Continuous Grazing Strategies</i> (Master's Thesis, North Dakota State University, Fargo, North Dakota).</p>
Non-commercial research comparing beef cattle responses and forage nutritive value, mineral content, and overall abundance across grazing management practices in the Northern Great Plains.
Temporal Extent Start Date
2017-05-01
Temporal Extent End Date
2020-10-01
Frequency
monthly
Theme
Not specified
ISO Topic Category
environment
farming
biota
National Agricultural Library Thesaurus terms
grasslands; North Dakota; patch burning; grazing management; rangelands; pastures; spring; fences; beef cattle; nutritive value; mineral content; Great Plains region